The exploits of the attackers do not end here; over the past three days, a total of 7,600 ETH, worth Rs 152 crores, has been transferred to various addresses, further complicating the efforts to recover the lost user funds. According to exclusive data accessed, a single transaction of 5,000 ETH was conducted at around 1:30 pm IST, marking a significant step in this elaborate scheme to launder the stolen assets.
Blockchain analytics firm PeckShield has shed light on these transactions, revealing that the "WazirX exploiter" transferred 5,000 ETH to a new wallet and has begun the process of filtering these funds through Tornado Cash. Within just 30 minutes of receiving the funds in the new wallet, 1,600 ETH was dispatched to Tornado Cash in 16 separate transactions, each involving 100 ETH. This method mirrors a strategy employed earlier on September 2, further indicating a systematic approach to obfuscating the origins of the stolen funds.
Learn More About Tornado Cash
Tornado Cash serves as a privacy-enhancing protocol by mixing funds in a manner that masks their original source. By amalgamating multiple transactions into a single output, tracing individual funds to their initial source becomes exponentially more challenging. Despite its utility in preserving anonymity, Tornado Cash has been under significant scrutiny for its potential role in abetting money laundering schemes, serving as a tool for exploiters seeking to veil the tracks of illicitly obtained assets.
With no help in sight, WazirX users turn to hacker for mercy
The legal quagmire between binance and Zettai Pte Ltd, the parent company of WazirX, has only exacerbated the uncertainty surrounding the recovery of user funds. WazirX co-founder Nischal Shetty has openly expressed his concerns over who holds the ultimate responsibility for the safety of these digital assets, leaving many users in a state of distress. In a desperate plea for resolution, the WazirX community has resorted to directly appealing to the attackers, urging them to consider a negotiation for the return of their assets.
Conclusion
The ongoing investigation into the WazirX exploit underscores the sophisticated challenges that authorities and blockchain monitoring services face in addressing cyber-theft within the cryptocurrency landscape. The usage of mechanisms like Tornado Cash complicates these efforts further, illuminating the intricate cat-and-mouse game between exploiters and those pursuing justice. As the digital age evolves, so too does the imperative for robust security measures and transparent ownership structures within cryptocurrency exchanges to prevent such breaches from undermining the trust and integrity of the digital economy.
The implications of this incident extend beyond the immediate loss of assets, prompting a critical examination of the mechanisms in place to safeguard users against such vulnerabilities. As the crypto community rallies to address these challenges, the case of the WazirX exploit remains a poignant reminder of the perpetual battle between technological advancement and the ever-present threat of cybercrime.
